The Living Solar System

I think we are way too underestimating our living solar system! She has a clock that regulates herself when there is too much destruction or disorder. She is her own brain! She has a soul! She has her own antivirus and she doesn't need us to activate it. She has her limits because we are not the only beings! There are several simultaneous dimensions and other creatures who also have the right to live! We behave like a virus to her and it's for this reason that this civilization will collapse! It's not adapted to our natural environment! What are you waiting for? You don't already perceive the greatness of our Universe which can crush us! You are underestimating a molecule that you can't see with your eyes! The microcosm is enough for her to exterminate us all! You can see it with the Covid-19 now! I want to tell you about James Lovelock who has already warned several times that the Earth could rise! I confirm his theory! Our nature remains unpredictable! Apply the solutions!

«  Lovelock is an independent scientist. Though fanatically accurate over details, he never isolates those details from a wider, more demanding vision of their background. He thinks big. Preferring, as Darwin did, to work outside the tramlines of an institution, he has supported himself since 1963 through inventions and consultancies. Reared in Quakerism, he remains, in his eighties, quiet, vigorous, amiable and intellectually explosive. »



Geophysiology

Forty years ago I postulated that the Earth is a self-regulating system able to keep the climate and chemical composition comfortable for organisms. This was the Gaia Hypothesis, which as evidence and mathematical models accumulated has now become Gaia Theory. Biologists and geologists heavily criticised the theory in its first twenty-five years; only climatologists found it useful.

Whether right or wrong, it is a testable theory and capable of making ‘risky’ predictions. One of these was that there should be a large enough emission of dimethyl sulphide from the oceans to balance the natural sulphur budget. Preliminary confirmation came from my own measurements in 1972; M.O Andreae made complete confirmation independently.
Later, when considering how the Earth system could regulate climate, Charlson, Lovelock, Andreae and Warren proposed that cloud density was modulated by the abundance of atmospheric dimethyl sulphide, and this in turn changed the Earth’s albedo and mean surface temperature. This proposal was published as a Nature paper in 1987 and is now generally accepted. Gaia Theory also offered an interpretation of the long-term regulation of carbon dioxide and climate through biologically assisted rock weathering.
In 1999, the eminent evolutionary biologist, William Hamilton, who had been a strong critic, stated in public that he regarded Gaia theory as a Copernican insight. He added that we await a Newton to explain how it works. Gaia theory is now part of scientific conventional wisdom and sometimes called Earth System Science. The name Gaia attracted so much opprobrium from scientists, especially in the U.S.A., that the name is still rejected, as is acknowledgement.
Following the Amsterdam Declaration in 2001, most scientists around the world now accept that the Earth does indeed self-regulate.

( © Source: www.jameslovelock.org - Photography: www.pixabay.com )